Russian lip technique guide: vertical filler for M-shaped cupid's bow definition

The Russian lip technique — named for the heart-shaped, defined cupid's bow lip aesthetic popular in Eastern European aesthetic medicine — uses a distinctive vertical injection approach to shape the lip rather than simply adding volume. It creates a lifted, M-shaped upper lip profile with central height rather than the outward projection of traditional lip filler. Here is a complete guide.

The aesthetic goal: what Russian lips are

Traditional lip filler vs. Russian lip technique

Traditional lip augmentation: Filler placed along the vermilion border (lip edge) and in the body of the lip — projecting the lip outward and increasing overall volume. Results in fuller lips that maintain the natural lip shape but project anteriorly.

Russian lip technique: Filler placed vertically in multiple columnar deposits from the base of the lip (wet-dry border) toward the cupid's bow — elevating the central upper lip upward rather than projecting it forward. Creates:
A more pronounced, defined M-shaped cupid's bow
Greater vertical height (the lip appears "taller" and more lifted)
A heart-shaped lip profile when viewed from the front
Less outward projection than traditional technique
The illusion of a shorter philtrum (the space between nose and lip)

The Russian technique is distinct from simply adding volume — it is a shaping technique that requires precise anatomical placement to achieve the characteristic profile.

---

The injection technique

Vertical columnar placement

Traditional technique: Horizontal cannula or needle advancing along the vermilion border, depositing filler in a retrograde thread.

Russian technique: Multiple discrete vertical injections from the wet-dry border (mucosal junction) toward the cupid's bow, with filler deposited in small columns as the needle is withdrawn.

Point count: Typically 4–8 injection points in the upper lip (2–4 columns per cupid's bow peak), 2–4 in the lower lip.

Injection plane: Deep to the orbicularis oris muscle or within the muscle body — not just subdermal. This deeper placement allows the filler column to provide vertical support to the lip tissue above it.

Volume: Russian technique uses smaller total volumes than dramatic volume augmentation — typically 0.5–1.0 mL per session, focused on shape definition rather than mass volume. Overfilling with the Russian technique produces an unnatural "sausage" appearance.

The central philtral columns

Many Russian lip injections also place filler in the philtral columns — the two raised ridges running from the upper lip to the nose. Enhancing these columns:
Further defines the cupid's bow
Creates greater central lift
Contributes to the shortened-philtrum visual effect

---

Product selection for Russian lips

Not all HA filler products are appropriate for the Russian technique:

Appropriate products (firm, cohesive, good G-prime):
Juvederm Volift (Europe) / Juvederm Ultra Plus (US analog)
Restylane Kysse
Teosyal RHA 2 or 3 (for the central vertical columns)
Belotero Intense

Why product selection matters: The vertical columns of the Russian technique must maintain their shape and provide upward lift — this requires a filler with sufficient cohesivity and G-prime (elastic modulus) to resist the mechanical forces of lip movement without spreading laterally. Soft, low-viscosity fillers (Belotero Soft, Juvederm Ultra) spread too readily and do not maintain the columnar structure needed for Russian technique definition.

Caution with very high G-prime products: Excessively stiff filler (Juvederm Voluma, Radiesse) in the lips can feel unnatural and produce lumps — the lip requires some flexibility. The ideal product has moderate cohesivity.

---

Anatomical risk differences vs. traditional technique

Higher vascular risk from central placement

The Russian technique's central, deep injections — particularly in the philtral columns and central upper lip — place the needle in closer proximity to the superior labial artery and its branches.

Superior labial artery anatomy: Runs within the lip, typically deep to the orbicularis oris or within the muscle, approximately 2–3 mm from the wet-dry border. Branches supply the central lip and philtrum.

Traditional lip technique (border): Injection along the vermilion border tends to be more superficial and lateral — the artery is typically deeper and more medial, with some anatomical safety margin.

Russian technique (central, deep): Vertical injections into the deep central lip and philtral columns are in the anatomical territory of the superior labial artery and its philtral branches. Vascular injury here can produce:
Labial artery occlusion → necrosis of the central upper lip and philtral skin
Retrograde embolization → risk to angular artery and further vascular territory

Mitigation: Use small-bore needles (30–31 gauge) or blunt-tip microcannulas; inject in small boluses (< 0.1 mL per point); aspirate before injection (with caveats — aspiration is not fully reliable in all vessels); use filler with slow injection technique; understand the emergency hyaluronidase protocol for vascular occlusion.

---

Who is a good candidate

Best candidates:
Natural lip size that is adequate or near-adequate — Russian technique shapes existing lip, works best with some baseline volume to sculpt
Those wanting definition, cupid's bow enhancement, and lift rather than dramatic volume
Patients who want a natural-looking, non-projected profile
Those with a longer philtrum who want the optical shortening effect of central lip height

Not ideal candidates:
Very thin lips with minimal baseline volume — the technique cannot create significant volume from nothing; some traditional volume first, then Russian shaping, works better
Those wanting large, projected, "pillow" lips — traditional volume technique achieves this more naturally
Patients who have had significant lip filler previously — prior filler can distort tissue planes; experienced assessment of starting anatomy is needed
Patients unwilling to accept the higher central lip vascular risk disclosure

---

Realistic expectations and duration

Duration: Russian lip filler lasts similarly to other lip filler — 6–12 months depending on product, metabolism, and lip movement. The shaped result becomes more natural with lip movement after 1–2 weeks as filler integrates.

Swelling: Lip filler swelling is universal — significant swelling for 24–72 hours is expected. The final Russian lip shape is not assessable for 2 weeks. Swelling is often asymmetric during healing; patients should wait the full 2 weeks before judging results.

Feeling: Lip filler of any technique is palpable in the lips for the first weeks; Russian vertical columns may be more discretely palpable. This normalizes as filler integrates with surrounding tissue.

Touch-up: Many Russian lip patients require a small touch-up at 2 weeks — asymmetry or areas needing refinement are common, particularly in the first session.

---

Looking for a lip filler or Russian lip provider? Browse med spa providers on MedSpot →