A clear guide to microdermabrasion — how the procedure works, what it reliably treats, how it compares to chemical peels and HydraFacial, and who should (and shouldn't) book it.
· By MedSpot Editorial · 4 min read
Microdermabrasion has been a med spa staple for decades — which means it has also been largely overshadowed by newer technologies. Here's a realistic look at what it does well and where it falls short.
Microdermabrasion is a mechanical exfoliation procedure that uses either:
Both methods remove the outermost layer of skin (stratum corneum) and stimulate mild increases in circulation and cell turnover.
Where it genuinely helps:
Where it doesn't deliver:
Good candidates:
Not appropriate for:
A standard microdermabrasion session takes 30–45 minutes. There is no numbing needed — the sensation is mild suction and mild abrasion, often described as a light sandpaper feeling.
Immediately after: Skin may appear pink and slightly sensitive for a few hours. Some patients experience a mild "glow" immediately.
No downtime: Patients can return to normal activities the same day. Avoid harsh exfoliants and sun exposure for 48–72 hours post-treatment.
| Treatment | Average cost |
|---|---|
| Standalone microdermabrasion | $75–$200 |
| Microdermabrasion + chemical peel | $150–$350 |
| Microdermabrasion + LED | $125–$250 |
| Series of 6 sessions | $350–$1,000 |
Many providers offer package pricing for series. As a maintenance treatment, monthly sessions are common.
| Treatment | Better than microdermabrasion at | Microdermabrasion's advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical peel | Pigmentation, acne scars, deeper texture | Mechanical only — no acid risk; more tolerable |
| HydraFacial | Overall skin quality (combines extraction + serums) | Lower cost; simpler treatment |
| RF microneedling | Laxity, deep scarring, significant texture | No downtime; no needles; very low risk |
| Dermaplaning | Removes peach fuzz; similar exfoliation | Better for congested/oily skin (suction component) |
| Laser resurfacing | Deep lines, pigmentation, significant texture | No downtime; no post-treatment peeling |
vs. HydraFacial specifically: HydraFacial has largely displaced microdermabrasion at many practices because it combines cleansing, exfoliation, extraction, and serum infusion in one session and treats a wider range of concerns. If a practice offers both, HydraFacial is usually worth the additional cost. (See our HydraFacial guide for a detailed comparison.)
Microdermabrasion still makes sense for:
It has largely been replaced for corrective work by newer technologies. As a maintenance and accessibility option, it remains a reasonable choice.
Ready to book a skincare treatment near you? Browse skincare providers on MedSpot →